louie
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by louie on Feb 6, 2011 20:10:56 GMT 12
i will be waiting with intrest, and so will meny meny more people, on why??? the best two teams were not in the final
|
|
|
|
Post by youngone on Feb 6, 2011 20:17:26 GMT 12
i will be waiting with intrest, and so will meny meny more people, on why??? the best two teams were not in the final why?? Because the GB team did not qualify for the semi finals! |
|
|
|
Post by busterbell on Feb 6, 2011 20:23:01 GMT 12
the stewards and referees of the meeting , appointed by the directors, shall recieve such remuneration as the directors may decide.
in no circumstances shall these officials accept money payment direct from a promotor.
|
|
roundnround
New Member
BOOTES GONA SMOKE YOU ALL...AND LET IT BE KNOWN!!
Posts: 37
|
Post by roundnround on Feb 6, 2011 20:24:48 GMT 12
WOW, maybe a few of you have taken this a tad too seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by hemi1969 on Feb 6, 2011 20:27:45 GMT 12
There's nothing wrong with criticizing the decision, we see bad decisions is sport all the time, but what was alleged was a little OTT in my opinion.
your opinon, just like the others that were voicing their opinons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2011 20:47:37 GMT 12
i will be waiting with intrest, and so will meny meny more people, on why??? the best two teams were not in the final Louie if you know not why by now, I'm sorry there is very little chance you ever will so best give it up now. Your understanding of the rules prob does not allow any further comprehension. The fact that you think there is a chief rep as posted in the deleted thread tells me you don't get it. |
|
louie
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by louie on Feb 6, 2011 21:05:51 GMT 12
ramjam, ment to say reps i missed the s,remember i have seen years of the teams champs, i know the rules.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2011 21:09:30 GMT 12
ramjam, ment to say reps i missed the s,remember i have seen years of the teams champs, i know the rules. but there is no chief reps Edit: in the context you have used it the word chief would mean leader, head of etc how can that title then be made a plural Anyway I give up. I have learned tonight from the "experts" I know nothing so that's cool |
|
|
|
Post by MadMarty13B on Feb 6, 2011 21:10:57 GMT 12
ramjam, ment to say reps i missed the s,remember i have seen years of the teams champs, i know the rules. but there is no chief reps But there is a 'chief' one eyed palmy supporter called Ram Jam  |
|
louie
New Member
Posts: 22
|
Post by louie on Feb 6, 2011 21:17:51 GMT 12
what would you like me to call them, and keep on the topic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2011 21:25:14 GMT 12
what would you like me to call them, and keep on the topic. Well what is it your trying to describe? Is it the chief stipendiary steward? Is it drivers reps? Is it senior referee? I honestly have know idea Anyway I'm so over this. Some of us have to go to work now ten mins ago. |
|
roundnround
New Member
BOOTES GONA SMOKE YOU ALL...AND LET IT BE KNOWN!!
Posts: 37
|
Post by roundnround on Feb 7, 2011 20:05:34 GMT 12
Hmmm, i guess what i was getting at in the initial thread was, whats stopping this happening in speedway, when theres money involvoed in any sport there will always be "biased" decisions, and sneaky rule bending. Look at league,tennis, cycling, cricket, boxing. Are we just relying on honesty?  |
|
